PSYC 882 - Ideology and Automaticity


Tuesdays 9-11:30, CAU 116
Fall 2006
Brian Nosek [Office 015, 924-0666, nosek@virginia.edu]

Below are the reading requirements. Clicking on the date will download a zipped file of some of the articles for that week. Articles that are not in the zip file appear in the required text.

Aug 29

No Class

Sep 5

Introduction : Jost, 2006; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977

12

Automaticity : Bargh, 1994; Bargh, 2006; Ferguson, 2006

19

Dual-Process Theories : Gilbert, 1999; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, in press; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Conrey et al. 2005

26

Authoritarianism and Ethnocentrism: Brown, 1965; McCann, 1997; Altemeyer, 1998; Cunningham, Nezlek, & Banaji, 2004

Oct 3

Ideology : Converse, 1964; Conover & Feldman, 1981; Lane, 1959

10

Decision-making : Quattrone & Tversky, 1988; Jervis, 1993; Lerner & Tetlock, 1999; Lavine, 2002

17

Social Identity, Social Dominance, System Justification : Tajfel & Turner, 1986; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, 2004

24

The world according to Jost: Tompkins, 1965; Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003; Greenberg & Jonas, 2003; Jost et al., 2003

31

The world according to Haidt: Haidt, 2001; Pizarro & Bloom, 2003; Haidt, 2003; Haidt, Chap 9, 2006; Haidt & Graham, 2006

Nov 7

Affect and intuition : Greene, in press; Greene et al., 2004; Forgas, 2002; Forgas, 2002b

14

Moral responsibility for controlled and uncontrolled acts: Alicke, 2000; Pizarro, Uhlmann & Bloom, 2003; Pizarro, Uhlmann, & Salovey, 2003; Woolfolk, Doris, & Darley, 2006

21

No Class – Thanksgiving Break

28

Morality of mentality and moral credentials : Rachman, 1998; Cohen & Rozin, 2001; Monin & Miller, 2001

Dec 5

Shifting standards for judging merit : Biernat, 2003; Uhlmann & Cohen, 2005; Egan & Cohen, 2006; Kalev, Dobbins, et al., 2006

This class will consider a wide range of phenomena considered to fit into the category of an implicit process or cognition. Implicit cognition may include processes or content that exists outside of introspective access, is influential on individual thinking and acting without being recognized, or is active and influential without intention or ability to control. The material for the course sits at the intersection of Social and Cognitive disciplines in that much of this research attempts to understand the basic cognitive processes that give rise to unexpected or uncontrollable behavior that unfolds in a social context. We will review the major themes and theories of this field with a focus on current issues of debate. In addition, we will examine some of the major constructs of interest to researchers of implicit cognition such as memory, learning, affect, stereotypes, and motives. The reading materials will be available at http://briannosek.com. [Auditors will need to complete requirements #1 and #2 below to participate.]


Requirements:

(1) Discussion Questions: 1 (or 2 depending on class size) discussion question on the week’s readings (13 total), to be submitted to session organizer by the Sunday before class at noon. These questions plus class participation is 30% of the total grade.

(2) Leading Discussion: Each person in the class will be the session organizer for 1 class meeting (or 2 depending on class size). This person will receive the week’s discussion questions, organize the questions to promote class discussion, and lead class discussion. This task is worth 10% of the total grade.

(3) 3 short papers: Each of these papers should state a research controversy or problem in need of a solution. Each paper should be NO MORE than 2 pages (double-spaced; normal margins; 11 or 12 point font). The paper should fit one of the following formats: (1) identify a problem raised by the week’s readings and argue for a specific solution based on existing research, (2) identify a problem raised by the week’s readings and develop then justify a test to solve the problem, or (3) offer an argument that extends or challenges an idea from the week’s readings. The three papers can be written at anytime, but no more than one for any given week. The paper must be turned in via email (nosek@virginia.edu) as a text, Word, or pdf file before the class in which those materials will be discussed. These papers count for 30% of the total grade.

(4) Research proposal: The research proposal should raise a problem inspired by the class content and propose an experimental test. The paper could be presented as an empirical report (in APA format), or in the form of a grant proposal (NSF or NIH). The paper should be 15 pages or less (double-spaced; normal margins; 11-12 point font). If written as an empirical report, in addition to the introduction and methods, a brief results section should report the expected result (hypothetical data), and a discussion should present the implications of the finding for the problem. This paper is due one week after the last day of class (Dec 12th), but can be turned in at any point during the semester. This will count for 30% of the total grade.

Anonymous Feedback || Roster || General Info

Brian's homepage